Impact of BMI on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D with calcifediol supplementation in young adults: a longitudinal study

Endocrine. 2024 Jun 11. doi: 10.1007/s12020-024-03895-0. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: High body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for vitamin D deficiency. The rise in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations following cholecalciferol supplementation is suboptimal, owing to adipose tissue sequestration and/or volumetric dilution. Calcifediol is a proven potent oral alternative for vitamin D supplementation, but whether BMI adversely affects its efficacy in raising 25(OH)D concentrations, is not well known.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adults with serum concentrations of 25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL were recruited and stratified as normal, overweight, or obese using WHO criteria. Baseline evaluation included 25(OH)D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and total 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)₂D] based on BMI category (n = 883). A subset of participants was supplemented with 50 µg calcifediol (n = 193) and assessed for the rise in serum concentrations of 25(OH)D at 3- and 6-months following supplementation.

RESULTS: Participants were stratified as obese (11.2%), overweight (32.1%), or normal weight (56.7%). There were no significant baseline differences in serum concentrations of 25(OH)D among the groups (13.1 ± 6.4 vs 12.8 ± 6.8 vs 11.6 ± 6.6 ng/mL, p = 0.62). Similarly, PTH or 1,25(OH)₂D concentrations were not different among the groups. On follow-up, 25(OH)D concentrations increased in all three groups at 3 and 6 months from baseline. The increase in 25(OH)D was 74.4 ng/mL (IQR 35.3-115.3) in obese, followed by overweight 62.2 ng/mL (18.1-98.7) and normal weight groups 47.1 ng/mL (17.5-89.7) at 3 months. 1,25(OH)₂D also increased in all groups, without any significant intergroup differences (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: BMI does not impede the rise in 25(OH)D concentrations following supplementation with calcifediol in young adults with vitamin D deficiency.

PMID:38861119 | DOI:10.1007/s12020-024-03895-0