Adverse Events with Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea-A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials and Real-World Data

J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 23;13(15):4282. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154282.

ABSTRACT

Background/Objectives: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) emerged as an alternative treatment for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) a decade ago. Long-term clinical trials and real-world data show that HNS treatment provides significant and sustained improvements in both OSA disease control and quality-of-life measures over time. Given the nature of HNS treatment, with the requirement of using an implantable neurostimulation system, patient safety is a critical domain in the assessment of this technology. The objective of this review was to evaluate adverse events (AEs) and complications with HNS therapy in a systematic review of published evidence. Methods: Medline, Cochrane, and Web of Science were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled and real-world observational studies reporting relevant outcomes with HNS therapy for treatment of OSA that included procedure-, device-, and treatment-related AEs. Results: Out of 418 articles screened, 27 were reviewed for eligibility, and 17 studies, the majority found to have low-to-moderate risk of bias, with data on 1962 patients were included for further analysis. Across included studies, reporting of AEs was heterogeneous with regard to the classifications used and the extent of reporting. Over an average follow-up duration of 17.5 ± 16.9 months, the pooled mortality rate was 0.01% (95% CI = 0.0 to 0.2%), with all reported deaths being unrelated to HNS treatment. The HNS system survival probability over the follow-up time of 60 months was 0.9834 (95% CI = 0.9768 to 0.9882), with infections and request for removal by patients being the most common indications. The pooled surgical revision rate was 0.08% (95% CI 0.0 to 0.2%). Most reported treatment-related side effects were transient stimulation-related discomfort (0.08%, 95% CI = 0.0 to 0.2%) and tongue abrasions (0.07%, 95% CI = 0.0 to 0.2%). Based on the systematic review, a standardized set of endpoints was defined, aiming to harmonize safety data relevant to HNS therapy. Conclusions: In this systematic review, HNS therapy for treatment of OSA is associated with a positive patient safety profile. AEs occur mainly at device implantation and during the treatment acclimatization period. Due to a lack of available evidence, partially implantable HNS systems are underrepresented in this review, which limits the generalizability of the results. Significant heterogeneity was found for adverse event reporting. A framework for reporting HNS outcomes that includes AEs and side effects is proposed to facilitate comparability of the reported data.

PMID:39124549 | DOI:10.3390/jcm13154282